SKILLED NOMINATED VISA (SUBCLASS 190)

Is your score enough for 190 Chemical Engineer?

Two questions, one honest answer: is your points score enough, and how long is the wait for Chemical Engineer (ANZSCO 233111) on the Skilled Nominated visa (subclass 190). Drag your score below.

Drag your points to see the answer

Move the slider to your real PR points. Everything updates live for the Skilled Nominated (190) stream.

80pointsAbout 13–22 months
35110

At 80 points, roughly 1.8k people sit at or above you in this Chemical Engineer Skilled Nominated (190) queue. That puts you roughly in the top 60% of eligible EOIs. That queue has grown about 14% over the months we can see, so waiting tends to add competition. Honest wait estimate: roughly 13–22 months. This stream already includes the +5 state-nomination points.

For context only: recent rounds we could read cleared near 85 points, but invitation data is heavily redacted, so treat that as a rough marker, not a target.

At or above you
~1.8k
Your standing
~Top 60%
Queue trend
Up 14%

Modelled from queue movement, not a prediction. Queue as at 06/2026.

Good data coverage. Most of this queue is exact public counts, so these positions are dependable.
Queue depth trend13 months
was 2,943now 3,355 in queue

Share your standing. The text line survives anywhere links get stripped.

190 | Chemical Engineer (233111) | 80 pts | est. wait 13–22 months | via sortedout.app/tools/190/chemical-engineer-233111

Calculate my exact points

Compare other visa streams for Chemical Engineer

Skilled Independent visa (subclass 189)Skilled Work Regional visa (subclass 491)

How to read this

The Department of Home Affairs invites the highest-scoring Expressions of Interest first, so what matters most is roughly how many people sit at or above your score in the Chemical Engineer queue, and whether that queue is growing or shrinking. The fewer people ahead of you and the more the queue is easing, the shorter your likely wait. We read this from the real submitted queue, not from invitation cut-offs, because the published invitation numbers are heavily redacted. Smaller brackets are published only as under twenty, so we frame your position as approximate, and at the very top of the queue, where almost everything is redacted, we describe where you sit rather than invent a precise count. The confidence note on the tool tells you how much of that queue is real public data. When the data is too thin to model a wait, we say so rather than guess.

Want your exact points, tracked every round?

Track where you stand in the Chemical Engineer queue, every round, with honest data.

See where you stand